HISTORIC SPEECHES
GEORGE WASHINGTON
Farewell
Address
September 19, 1796
Friends and Citizens:
The period for a new election of a citizen to administer
the executive government of the United States being not
far distant, and the time actually arrived when your thoughts
must be employed in designating the person who is to be
clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper,
especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression
of the public voice, that I should now apprise you of the
resolution I have formed, to decline being considered among
the number of those out of whom a choice is to be made.
I beg you, at the same time, to do me the justice to be
assured that this resolution has not been taken without
a strict regard to all the considerations appertaining
to the relation which binds a dutiful citizen to his country;
and that in withdrawing the tender of service, which silence
in my situation might imply, I am influenced by no diminution
of zeal for your future interest, no deficiency of grateful
respect for your past kindness, but am supported by a full
conviction that the step is compatible with both.
The acceptance of, and continuance hitherto in, the office
to which your suffrages have twice called me have been
a uniform sacrifice of inclination to the opinion of duty
and to a deference for what appeared to be your desire.
I constantly hoped that it would have been much earlier
in my power, consistently with motives which I was not
at liberty to disregard, to return to that retirement from
which I had been reluctantly drawn. The strength of my
inclination to do this, previous to the last election,
had even led to the preparation of an address to declare
it to you; but mature reflection on the then perplexed
and critical posture of our affairs with foreign nations,
and the unanimous advice of persons entitled to my confidence,
impelled me to abandon the idea.
I rejoice that the state of your concerns, external as
well as internal, no longer renders the pursuit of inclination
incompatible with the sentiment of duty or propriety, and
am persuaded, whatever partiality may be retained for my
services, that, in the present circumstances of our country,
you will not disapprove my determination to retire.
The impressions with which I first undertook the arduous
trust were explained on the proper occasion. In the discharge
of this trust, I will only say that I have, with good intentions,
contributed towards the organization and administration
of the government the best exertions of which a very fallible
judgment was capable. Not unconscious in the outset of
the inferiority of my qualifications, experience in my
own eyes, perhaps still more in the eyes of others, has
strengthened the motives to diffidence of myself; and every
day the increasing weight of years admonishes me more and
more that the shade of retirement is as necessary to me
as it will be welcome. Satisfied that if any circumstances
have given peculiar value to my services, they were temporary,
I have the consolation to believe that, while choice and
prudence invite me to quit the political scene, patriotism
does not forbid it.
In looking forward to the moment which is intended to
terminate the career of my public life, my feelings do
not permit me to suspend the deep acknowledgment of that
debt of gratitude which I owe to my beloved country for
the many honors it has conferred upon me; still more for
the steadfast confidence with which it has supported me;
and for the opportunities I have thence enjoyed of manifesting
my inviolable attachment, by services faithful and persevering,
though in usefulness unequal to my zeal. If benefits have
resulted to our country from these services, let it always
be remembered to your praise, and as an instructive example
in our annals, that under circumstances in which the passions,
agitated in every direction, were liable to mislead, amidst
appearances sometimes dubious, vicissitudes of fortune
often discouraging, in situations in which not unfrequently
want of success has countenanced the spirit of criticism,
the constancy of your support was the essential prop of
the efforts, and a guarantee of the plans by which they
were effected. Profoundly penetrated with this idea, I
shall carry it with me to my grave, as a strong incitement
to unceasing vows that heaven may continue to you the choicest
tokens of its beneficence; that your union and brotherly
affection may be perpetual; that the free Constitution,
which is the work of your hands, may be sacredly maintained;
that its administration in every department may be stamped
with wisdom and virtue; that, in fine, the happiness of
the people of these States, under the auspices of liberty,
may be made complete by so careful a preservation and so
prudent a use of this blessing as will acquire to them
the glory of recommending it to the applause, the affection,
and adoption of every nation which is yet a stranger to
it.
Here, perhaps, I ought to stop. But a solicitude for your
welfare, which cannot end but with my life, and the apprehension
of danger, natural to that solicitude, urge me, on an occasion
like the present, to offer to your solemn contemplation,
and to recommend to your frequent review, some sentiments
which are the result of much reflection, of no inconsiderable
observation, and which appear to me all-important to the
permanency of your felicity as a people. These will be
offered to you with the more freedom, as you can only see
in them the disinterested warnings of a parting friend,
who can possibly have no personal motive to bias his counsel.
Nor can I forget, as an encouragement to it, your indulgent
reception of my sentiments on a former and not dissimilar
occasion.
Interwoven as is the love of liberty with every ligament
of your hearts, no recommendation of mine is necessary
to fortify or confirm the attachment.
The unity of government which constitutes you one people
is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main
pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support
of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your
safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which
you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that,
from different causes and from different quarters, much
pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken
in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is
the point in your political fortress against which the
batteries of internal and external enemies will be most
constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously)
directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly
estimate the immense value of your national union to your
collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish
a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming
yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium
of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its
preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever
may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be
abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning
of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country
from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now
link together the various parts.
For this you have every inducement of sympathy and interest.
Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that
country has a right to concentrate your affections. The
name of American, which belongs to you in your national
capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism
more than any appellation derived from local discriminations.
With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion,
manners, habits, and political principles. You have in
a common cause fought and triumphed together; the independence
and liberty you possess are the work of joint counsels,
and joint efforts of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.
But these considerations, however powerfully they address
themselves to your sensibility, are greatly outweighed
by those which apply more immediately to your interest.
Here every portion of our country finds the most commanding
motives for carefully guarding and preserving the union
of the whole.
The North, in an unrestrained intercourse with the South,
protected by the equal laws of a common government, finds
in the productions of the latter great additional resources
of maritime and commercial enterprise and precious materials
of manufacturing industry. The South, in the same intercourse,
benefiting by the agency of the North, sees its agriculture
grow and its commerce expand. Turning partly into its own
channels the seamen of the North, it finds its particular
navigation invigorated; and, while it contributes, in different
ways, to nourish and increase the general mass of the national
navigation, it looks forward to the protection of a maritime
strength, to which itself is unequally adapted. The East,
in a like intercourse with the West, already finds, and
in the progressive improvement of interior communications
by land and water, will more and more find a valuable vent
for the commodities which it brings from abroad, or manufactures
at home. The West derives from the East supplies requisite
to its growth and comfort, and, what is perhaps of still
greater consequence, it must of necessity owe the secure
enjoyment of indispensable outlets for its own productions
to the weight, influence, and the future maritime strength
of the Atlantic side of the Union, directed by an indissoluble
community of interest as one nation. Any other tenure by
which the West can hold this essential advantage, whether
derived from its own separate strength, or from an apostate
and unnatural connection with any foreign power, must be
intrinsically precarious.
While, then, every part of our country thus feels an immediate
and particular interest in union, all the parts combined
cannot fail to find in the united mass of means and efforts
greater strength, greater resource, proportionably greater
security from external danger, a less frequent interruption
of their peace by foreign nations; and, what is of inestimable
value, they must derive from union an exemption from those
broils and wars between themselves, which so frequently
afflict neighboring countries not tied together by the
same governments, which their own rival ships alone would
be sufficient to produce, but which opposite foreign alliances,
attachments, and intrigues would stimulate and embitter.
Hence, likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those
overgrown military establishments which, under any form
of government, are inauspicious to liberty, and which are
to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty.
In this sense it is that your union ought to be considered
as a main prop of your liberty, and that the love of the
one ought to endear to you the preservation of the other.
These considerations speak a persuasive language to every
reflecting and virtuous mind, and exhibit the continuance
of the Union as a primary object of patriotic desire. Is
there a doubt whether a common government can embrace so
large a sphere? Let experience solve it. To listen to mere
speculation in such a case were criminal. We are authorized
to hope that a proper organization of the whole with the
auxiliary agency of governments for the respective subdivisions,
will afford a happy issue to the experiment. It is well
worth a fair and full experiment. With such powerful and
obvious motives to union, affecting all parts of our country,
while experience shall not have demonstrated its impracticability,
there will always be reason to distrust the patriotism
of those who in any quarter may endeavor to weaken its
bands.
In contemplating the causes which may disturb our Union,
it occurs as matter of serious concern that any ground
should have been furnished for characterizing parties by
geographical discriminations, Northern and Southern, Atlantic
and Western; whence designing men may endeavor to excite
a belief that there is a real difference of local interests
and views. One of the expedients of party to acquire influence
within particular districts is to misrepresent the opinions
and aims of other districts. You cannot shield yourselves
too much against the jealousies and heartburnings which
spring from these misrepresentations; they tend to render
alien to each other those who ought to be bound together
by fraternal affection. The inhabitants of our Western
country have lately had a useful lesson on this head; they
have seen, in the negotiation by the Executive, and in
the unanimous ratification by the Senate, of the treaty
with Spain, and in the universal satisfaction at that event,
throughout the United States, a decisive proof how unfounded
were the suspicions propagated among them of a policy in
the General Government and in the Atlantic States unfriendly
to their interests in regard to the Mississippi; they have
been witnesses to the formation of two treaties, that with
Great Britain, and that with Spain, which secure to them
everything they could desire, in respect to our foreign
relations, towards confirming their prosperity. Will it
not be their wisdom to rely for the preservation of these
advantages on the Union by which they were procured ? Will
they not henceforth be deaf to those advisers, if such
there are, who would sever them from their brethren and
connect them with aliens?
To the efficacy and permanency of your Union, a government
for the whole is indispensable. No alliance, however strict,
between the parts can be an adequate substitute; they must
inevitably experience the infractions and interruptions
which all alliances in all times have experienced. Sensible
of this momentous truth, you have improved upon your first
essay, by the adoption of a constitution of government
better calculated than your former for an intimate union,
and for the efficacious management of your common concerns.
This government, the offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced
and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature
deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the
distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy,
and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment,
has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect
for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence
in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental
maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems
is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions
of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists,
till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole
people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea
of the power and the right of the people to establish government
presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established
government.
All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations
and associations, under whatever plausible character, with
the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe
the regular deliberation and action of the constituted
authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle,
and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction,
to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put,
in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will
of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority
of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs
of different parties, to make the public administration
the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects
of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome
plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual
interests.
However combinations or associations of the above description
may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely,
in the course of time and things, to become potent engines,
by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will
be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp
for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards
the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.
Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency
of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only
that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions
to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist
with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles,
however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may
be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations
which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to
undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. In all the
changes to which you may be invited, remember that time
and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character
of governments as of other human institutions; that experience
is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency
of the existing constitution of a country; that facility
in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion,
exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of
hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that
for the efficient management of your common interests,
in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much
vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty
is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government,
with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest
guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where
the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises
of faction, to confine each member of the society within
the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all
in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person
and property.
I have already intimated to you the danger of parties
in the State, with particular reference to the founding
of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take
a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn
manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party
generally.
This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature,
having its root in the strongest passions of the human
mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments,
more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in
those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness,
and is truly their worst enemy.
The alternate domination of one faction over another,
sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension,
which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the
most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.
But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent
despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually
incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in
the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later
the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more
fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition
to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public
liberty.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which
nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the
common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are
sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people
to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble
the public administration. It agitates the community with
ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity
of one part against another, foments occasionally riot
and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence
and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the
government itself through the channels of party passions.
Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected
to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion that parties in free countries are
useful checks upon the administration of the government
and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within
certain limits is probably true; and in governments of
a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence,
if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those
of the popular character, in governments purely elective,
it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural
tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of
that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being
constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force
of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not
to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent
its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it
should consume.
It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking
in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted
with its administration, to confine themselves within their
respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise
of the powers of one department to encroach upon another.
The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers
of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever
the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate
of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which
predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy
us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal
checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing
and distributing it into different depositaries, and constituting
each the guardian of the public weal against invasions
by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient
and modern; some of them in our country and under our own
eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute
them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution
or modification of the constitutional powers be in any
particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in
the way which the Constitution designates. But let there
be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance,
may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon
by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent
must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial
or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political
prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.
In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism,
who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human
happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and
citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man,
ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not
trace all their connections with private and public felicity.
Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property,
for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation
desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation
in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge
the supposition that morality can be maintained without
religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of
refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason
and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality
can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
It is substantially true that virtue or morality is a
necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed,
extends with more or less force to every species of free
government. Who that is a sincere friend to it can look
with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation
of the fabric?
Promote then, as an object of primary importance, institutions
for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as
the structure of a government gives force to public opinion,
it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened.
As a very important source of strength and security, cherish
public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it
as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense
by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely
disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent
much greater disbursements to repel it, avoiding likewise
the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions
of expense, but by vigorous exertion in time of peace to
discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned,
not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which
we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims
belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that
public opinion should co-operate. To facilitate to them
the performance of their duty, it is essential that you
should practically bear in mind that towards the payment
of debts there must be revenue; that to have revenue there
must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised which are not
more or less inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic
embarrassment, inseparable from the selection of the proper
objects (which is always a choice of difficulties), ought
to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the
conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit
of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue,
which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.
Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate
peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin
this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not
equally enjoin it 7 It will be worthy of a free, enlightened,
and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind
the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always
guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt
that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such
a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which
might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be that
Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of
a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is
recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature.
Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?
In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential
than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular
nations, and passionate attachments for others, should
be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable
feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which
indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual
fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its
animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient
to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy
in one nation against another disposes each more readily
to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes
of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental
or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent
collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests.
The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes
impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations
of policy. The government sometimes participates in the
national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason
would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of
the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated
by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives.
The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations,
has been the victim.
So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for
another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite
nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common
interest in cases where no real common interest exists,
and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays
the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars
of the latter without adequate inducement or justification.
It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of
privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure
the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting
with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting
jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in
the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And
it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who
devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to
betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country,
without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding,
with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation,
a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable
zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of
ambition, corruption, or infatuation.
As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such
attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened
and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they
afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the
arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence
or awe the public councils 7 Such an attachment of a small
or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former
to be the satellite of the latter.
Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure
you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free
people ought to be constantly awake, since history and
experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most
baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy
to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument
of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense
against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation
and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they
actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil
and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real
patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are
liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools
and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people,
to surrender their interests.
The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign
nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have
with them as little political connection as possible. So
far as we have already formed engagements, let them be
fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe
has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or
a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent
controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign
to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in
us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary
vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations
and collisions of her friendships or enmities.
Our detached and distant situation invites and enables
us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people
under an efficient government. the period is not far off
when we may defy material injury from external annoyance;
when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality
we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected;
when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making
acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving
us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our
interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.
Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation?
Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by
interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe,
entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European
ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice?
It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances
with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean,
as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood
as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements.
I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private
affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat
it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their
genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and
would be unwise to extend them.
Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments
on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust
to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.
Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended
by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial
policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither
seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting
the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying
by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing;
establishing (with powers so disposed, in order to give
trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants,
and to enable the government to support them) conventional
rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances
and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable
to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience
and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in
view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested
favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of
its independence for whatever it may accept under that
character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself
in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal
favors, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for
not giving more. There can be no greater error than to
expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation.
It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a
just pride ought to discard.
In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an
old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will
make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that
they will control the usual current of the passions, or
prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto
marked the destiny of nations. But, if I may even flatter
myself that they may be productive of some partial benefit,
some occasional good; that they may now and then recur
to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the
mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures
of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense
for the solicitude for your welfare, by which they have
been dictated.
How far in the discharge of my official duties I have
been guided by the principles which have been delineated,
the public records and other evidences of my conduct must
witness to you and to the world. To myself, the assurance
of my own conscience is, that I have at least believed
myself to be guided by them.
In relation to the still subsisting war in Europe, my
proclamation of the twenty-second of April, I793, is the
index of my plan. Sanctioned by your approving voice, and
by that of your representatives in both houses of Congress,
the spirit of that measure has continually governed me,
uninfluenced by any attempts to deter or divert me from
it.
After deliberate examination, with the aid of the best
lights I could obtain, I was well satisfied that our country,
under all the circumstances of the case, had a right to
take, and was bound in duty and interest to take, a neutral
position. Having taken it, I determined, as far as should
depend upon me, to maintain it, with moderation, perseverance,
and firmness.
The considerations which respect the right to hold this
con duct, it is not necessary on this occasion to detail.
I will only observe that, according to my understanding
of the matter, that right, so far from being denied by
any of the belligerent powers, has been virtually admitted
by all.
The duty of holding a neutral conduct may be inferred,
without anything more, from the obligation which justice
and humanity impose on every nation, in cases in which
it is free to act, to maintain inviolate the relations
of peace and amity towards other nations.
The inducements of interest for observing that conduct
will best be referred to your own reflections and experience.
With me a predominant motive has been to endeavor to gain
time to our country to settle and mature its yet recent
institutions, and to progress without interruption to that
degree of strength and consistency which is necessary to
give it, humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes.
Though, in reviewing the incidents of my administration,
I am unconscious of intentional error, I am nevertheless
too sensible of my defects not to think it probable that
I may have committed many errors. Whatever they may be,
I fervently beseech the Almighty to avert or mitigate the
evils to which they may tend. I shall also carry with me
the hope that my country will never cease to view them
with indulgence; and that, after forty five years of my
life dedicated to its service with an upright zeal, the
faults of incompetent abilities will be consigned to oblivion,
as myself must soon be to the mansions of rest.
Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and
actuated by that fervent love towards it, which is so natural
to a man who views in it the native soil of himself and
his progenitors for several generations, I anticipate with
pleasing expectation that retreat in which I promise myself
to realize, without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking,
in the midst of my fellow-citizens, the benign influence
of good laws under a free government, the ever-favorite
object of my heart, and the happy reward, as I trust, of
our mutual cares, labors, and dangers.

<< Go
Back